All of the readings for the week had a few central themes
worth discussing further. The Strong chapter asks us to try to make our writing
assignments more active, relevant, and
purposeful. This connects well with last week’s D&Z chapter on
providing variety in sources, with Strong asking us to do the same with our
assignments. Use variety when we create our assignments under the CRAFT rubric,
and students will feel like they have a role in the assignment and not just an
innocent bystander. In Chapter 6 of D&Z, the authors provide six activities
to get reading a textbook more active,
relevant, and purposeful, in an attempt to make the dry, raw material of
the text more accessible. As you can see through my utilization of the bold
lettering, I used the same words to describe the two separate readings dealing
with two separate topics, textbooks and writing assignments. After finishing the
strong chapter however, I realized that there was an underlying theme with
these articles that are essential concepts to the philosophy of teaching in
general.
One
statement that stuck out to me in the strong chapter was how one teacher
reflected on the creative writing assignment she implemented in her classroom,
saying that she cannot see herself going back to the “stand and deliver” method
of teaching. I think that’s what both of these readings are trying to tell us.
That type of teaching needs to become almost obsolete because it simply doesn’t
work anymore. Whether it is drudgingly
going through a textbook to provide your students with knowledge that will
almost definitely forget when the test is over, or giving them a standard,
straight-forward 3 page essay on a topic they couldn’t care less about, that
kind of teaching does not harness the power of real learning. If we are going
to model our teaching methods on backwards design, then we need to start
instilling some real, meaningful, engaging, and relevant assignments and
sources for our students. Make them feel like they are a part of something and
not just an on-looker. We heard it from the students on the panel, they want
respect and to feel like what they are doing matters. By putting the
traditional methods of textbooks and essay writing under a microscope, we can
manipulate these processes to cater to the student’s wishes for connection with
their learning.
From our microteaching experiences, it feels weird when you, as a teacher, are just standing around monitoring students rather than being up at the front of the class and lecturing, but the outcome feels so much better. Providing students with the opportunity to experience what they are learning yields better outcomes than that dry, raw material everyone is so used to. I felt so proud when I heard someone say that, even thought they hated math, the lesson was fun and they got more out of it than they would have a lecture. Its a great feeling when you know your students are learning, especially when they can learn it on their own and enjoy doing it.
ReplyDeleteReading a textbook and then giving some boring writing assignment about what was read is not fun for the student and I can't imagine it would be fun for us. I am a firm believer in the opinion/argument paper. Take a side and tell me why you are taking that stand. It is way more interactive and helps the student really understand the material. It is easy to do with history because students have to support arguments with historical facts to prove they learned the material, and I would think it would be easy for English and possibly more fun.
ReplyDeleteHey Ryan,
ReplyDeleteYou mentioned something that happens too often and I must really keep in mind, "drudgingly going through a textbook to provide your students with knowledge that will almost definitely forget when the test is over". It enrages me that teachers let this happen. Everything that is taught should have a purpose. I don't see why teach something that will not be brought up in the future. Memorizing information towards passing a test doesn't lead to intellectual growth.
-Adrián